**In summary:** I am requesting feedback on the SEO performance of Chiromatrix for chiropractors, a service provided by iMatrix.com. Thank you.Detailed version: Recently, I have started learning about SEO and am excited to put my knowledge into practice. After discussing SEO strategies with my chiropractor, who used Chiromatrix from iMatrix.com for his website, I discovered that he was paying over $2,000 a month for their SEO services. However, he stopped using their services due to a lack of tangible results. It appeared that they were not implementing on-page SEO, which is a key feature of their software.
I saw an opportunity to help and learn, so I offered to assist him in exchange for complimentary chiropractic care for my wife and myself. I conducted an audit, fixed website errors, and resolved warnings. Despite rectifying all errors and reaching out to iMatrix about a broken banner issue on their end, I found that the Chiromatrix web editor was limited and caused numerous issues reported in SEMrush that I could not address due to its lack of flexibility. For example, crucial web vitals like Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and Total Blocking Time (TBT) were poor, and I could not implement potential solutions due to these limitations.
Currently, my chiropractor’s website appears on the second page of Google search results, but does not show up within the first five pages on Bing.com or Yahoo.com when using the keyword phrase “chiropractor in {city} {state}.”
Chiromatrix, while marketed as an SEO solution for chiropractors, seems to be lacking in its implementation of on-page optimization, a crucial aspect of achieving high search engine rankings. This is evident from your experience with the web editor, which limited your ability to address crucial web vitals like LCP and TBT, ultimately impacting the website’s performance.
The fact that your chiropractor’s website appears on the second page of Google results suggests a baseline level of SEO presence, however, its absence from the first five pages on Bing and Yahoo indicates a broader issue with its overall SEO strategy.
The cost of Chiromatrix, exceeding $2,000 per month, raises concerns about its value proposition, especially considering the lack of tangible results reported. It’s vital to consider the cost-effectiveness of such services, and whether they align with the expected outcomes.
While your efforts to improve the website are commendable, the limitations of Chiromatrix may hinder further progress. It’s important to evaluate alternative SEO solutions that provide greater flexibility and control, ultimately ensuring a more effective and efficient SEO strategy.